ARTICLE CRITIQUE 4
Concurrent and predictive validity of Pearson Test of EnglishAcademic (PTE Academic)
This article seeks to find the validity of the newly introducedEnglish test called the Pearson Test of English Academic (PTEAcademic). The article uses the standard research procedure to seekanswers to the research questions that have been highlighted. Theintroduction to the article acts as the literature review for theresearch. It would have been prudent for the author to separate theintroduction with the literature review. This would have made it easyfor the reader to identify information gathered by other authorsregarding the topic of discussion. The division of the article intovarious sections such as the research questions, research method,results and conclusion makes the comprehension of the paper easy. Itis clear that the paper is well organized and the content is clear.
The participants in the study were totally representative. Theresearch used participants from different nationalities.Additionally, it is clear from the research that the researcher used60 students who included both undergraduate (37) and postgraduate(23). It is also essential to state that the students were pulledfrom different disciplines such as sciences, business and economics,as well as arts and humanities (Riazi, 2014). This is an indicationthat the research participants were representative. This implies thatthere was no room for bias and the results obtained were a truereflection or answers to the questions asked. It is essential to notethat the first step towards having a trustworthy and effectiveresearch involves the selection of the participants. It must be seenthat there is no bias and there is no possibility to influence theresearch results.
Another aspect of the article that is essential is the presentationof the results. It is clear that the results to the various have beenpresented clearly. The use of tables to tabulate the data has made itextremely easy for the reader to understand the results. Forinstance, the third question which seeks to find out whether there isany relationship between PTE academic scores and the overall academicachievement has clearly been presented. The results have indicatedthat there is a correlation between the PTE academic scores and theacademic achievement at the GPA. It is also worth noting that thetables are followed by explanations which expound on the datapresented. It is evident that the author of the article chose to havediscussions after every question rather than having the discussionafter the results. This is a strategy that has made the article easyto understand and follow as opposed to situations where the readerhas to scroll up down from the discussion back to the researchresults.
The research questions that were identified by the researcher weresufficient to answer the question of whether the new English test wasvalid. Although the article has been cited as being prudent, it isessential to note that the selection of participants who had done anIELTS Academic in the last six months seemed biased. It is essentialto note that there might have been other willing participants who haddone the same test in more than six months prior to the PTE academic.The author has made use of relevant references which aid in gatheringprevious information regarding the PTE academic. It is alsocommendable that the article contains a conclusion which summarizesthe findings.
Riazi, M. (2014). Research Note: Concurrent and predictive validityof Pearson Test of English Academic (PTE Academic). AlwaysLearning. Australia: Macquarie University.