Instructor`s Class

Free essays 0 Comments

Insert Surname Here 2



LincolnDouglas Case Paper on Lowering the Drinking Age

Lincoln-Douglas debates dates back to 1858.they were held in the 18th centuryduring campaigns for the Senatorial seat in Illinois. Since then,there have been heated debates on lowering the drinking age in theUSA with prevailing pros being cited. Under the 1984 National MinimumDrinking Age Act {23 U.S.C 158}, anybody aged below 21 years areprohibited from buying alcohol throughout America (Saylor 332).Though some exemptions exist in some states when it’s taken fromthe home, supervision from adults and were consumed for medicalpurposes, drinking age persists.

Manypeople propose that lowering the age to 18 would be a good move. Thisis believed so because teenagers in 18 are practically adults. Theybelieve that it is funny that the said teenager can marry,participate in an election, buy guns, but cannot purchase alcohol orconsume it which happens to be the easiest of them all! PresidentObama amended the law to lower the drinking age to 18 and it tookeffect from June 4th, 2015. Lowering the age would be advantageous inthat it reduces the risk of alcohol consumption in dangeroussettings. Younger people tend to crave for alcohol more making themenjoy it dangerously in the wrong environments like fraternity houses(Carpenter et al 140). This means that legalizing if earlier wouldeliminate risky behaviors and promote safe consumption withsupervision.

Anotheradvantage would be teenagers reducing the thrill of violating the lawwith an intention of proving a point. This is referred to as ‘’theforbidden fruit theory’’. The tendency to procure fake identitycards or deliberately breaking the law to get away with it would be athing of the past. In addition, persons under 21 are still drinkingdespite it being illegal. They go on ignoring the law. Theinconsistent lack of enforcement and the community, not supportingthe laws will be forgotten Teenagers would stop the drinking gamesand their way of socialization if it is made legal (Saylor 330).

Thelegalization of the lower drinking age would make the adults awarethat their kids are engaging in alcohol consumption and hence wouldhelp them educate the kids on risks associated with it. This willcounter the secretive drinking that makes it difficult for adults toguide their kids. Instances of alcohol poisoning, which are rampantwould steadily reduce. This is prompted by the teenagers having largealcohol intakes within a short period of time. This is precisebecause of fear of being nabbed and limited ways of obtaining alcoholas well as not being allowed to consume alcohol openly.

Automobilecrashes associated with drunken driving would also reducesignificantly if the drinking age is reduced. A higher drinking agehas not prevented the fatalities in the U.S.A from being enormous ascompared to other nations with a lower drinking age. A larger numberof vehicles are still available to the young people. Lowered drinkingage would teach children responsible drinking at a tender age. His isbecause the adults would openly model their kids from home and teachthem the effects that come with larger irresponsible drinking. Forexample, by clearly explaining to them how excessive drinking canresult in alcoholism and substance addiction hence deterring themfrom the menace (Carpenter et al 140). It is clear that college andunderage drinking are rampant and a serious challenge to all.However, amending the law governing the drinking age is of theessence and would significantly reduce the effects associated withthe high drinking age.


Carpenter,Christopher, and Carlos Dobkin. &quotThe Minimum Legal Drinking AgeAnd Public Health.&quot&nbspJournalOf Economic Perspectives&nbsp25.2(2011): 133-156.&nbspBusinessSource Complete.Web. 21 Mar. 2016.

Saylor,Drew K. &quotHeavy Drinking On College Campuses: No Reason To ChangeMinimum Legal Drinking Age Of 21.&quot&nbspJournalOf American College Health&nbsp59.4(2011): 330-333.&nbspProfessionalDevelopment Collection.Web. 21 Mar. 2016.