Is Mono-Cultural Churches a Scandal?

Free essays 0 Comments

Is Mono-CulturalChurches a Scandal?

Thechurch is called upon to act as both the sign and instrument of theGod`s kingdom1.Acting as a sign, the church directs to the God`s kingdom as theright witness to its power and reality. Individuals are supposed tofocus on the church and exclaim, &quotThat`s how God`s kingdom lookslike.&quot Acting as an instrument, the agent of God to the world isthe church, sharing Jesus` love to the hurting and broken world isopen. In this sense, it is a door into the God`s kingdom to encourageother individuals to be part of the fellowship of faithful, connectedby Christ.

In the Bible, Revelation Chapter 7 talks about how men and women offaith will gather together around the God`s throne for eternity, andthat they will emerge from different tongues, tribes, and nations.The difference in However, the churches, in recent times, across thelandscape, is still mono-cultural. A United Kingdom missiologistrecently acclaim that we have a lot of diverse communities, whichcontains predominant mono-cultural churches, and that good fullyintegrated church models are rare. Based on the New Testamentteachings, the whole scenario may be seen as one of the recent&quotmodern scandals of evangelicalism.&quot The paper, therefore,agrees about these churches are &quotmodern scandals ofevangelicalism&quot by drawing relevance from the Bible.

MonoculturalChurches a Modern Scandal of Evangelicalism

To begin with, Galatians 3:26-30 states that, &quotwe are allreferred to as the sons of God.&quot2A monocultural church disregards the fact that our identity is foundin God through His Son, Jesus Christ, and that cultural ethnicityshould not take part in any negative role in the manner in which weengage and relate with one another and the Kingdom`s work.Monocultural churches, instead of uniting people as the &quotsons ofGod,&quot its scandalous nature is found in the fact that the peoplebecome more ethnically, racially, and culturally sensitive to oneother.3In the modern multi-cultural churches, it is healthy to talk aboutthe differences in ethnicity, race, and culture in the church as partof daily interactions.

Secondly, mono-cultural churches are a modern scandal for evangelismin that they encourage unsafe haven for people from differentcultural and ethnic background. Regardless of people`s culturalethnicity, no one wants to worship or seek God in a palace, whichfeels &quotunsafe,&quot however mono-cultural churches havesucceeded in this quest. What these churches have done is that,instead of encouraging safe and sound doctrines with accessible anddiverse cultural experiences, they have managed to create places ofworship with no love and sound theology, but culturally distant.4For example, Paul in Ephesians 4:12-13 writes about the need forChristians to attain unity in keeping the faith and growing up tomaturity, knitted together with all sections of the human bodyworking in the right way, and in all this is love.

One question resurfaces from the book of Ephesians 4: Domono-cultural churches assist with building the body of Christ? It isevident mono-cultural churches is scandalous in the sense that itstruggles with their redemption to call up, impact, and transformmulti-cultural communities. For instance, what makes humans, despitethe race and ethnicity, exclusively is in the thinking, which when itis confined in a cultural convergence, tend to limit and curtail theability to be an influence and share love across ethnic borders.51st John 1:5 emphasizes that God has called on us to &quotimpact andpenetrate all walks&quot in the society, which makes it even harderwhen there is a single focus on a single particular group of people.

Monocultural churches fail to create a haven for a betterunderstanding of what is considered the primary need and what is apreference. These churches are “modern scandals of evangelicalism&quotin that they fail to work constantly to solve the diverse needs ofdifferent groups, which in turn do not reflect the important truthsof the New Testament and the entire gospel. The church is the &quotbodyof Christ.&quot6Here, what mono-cultural churches fail to understand is that &quotTheChurch&quot is regarded as a &quotuniversal body or entity thatembraces all the believers&quot7

The scandalous nature of these churches is that they do embracepeople`s diversity in culture and ethnicity. In Ephesians 1:22-24,the fullness of the Church is well-mediated in the diversity andrichness of the body, which fulfills the entirety.8Therefore, to disregard the existence of the mono-cultural churches,every church fails to exist or be a part of the community in itsentirety as a single entity.

This means that mono-cultural churches, based on the missiologiststatement, is a scandal to the modern evangelicalism and to thekingdom of God in that different communities have different cultures.This is because most situations in which different churches facetoday, in what is termed as the &quotglobal village,&quot do notappear like this.9The community that people live in is a mix of cultures andnationalities, which makes it wrong to say that mono-culturalchurches are in a better position to fulfill their redemptive call ofbeing a united entity.

Tobe one entity like a church, disregarding what mono-cultural churchesstand for, draws relevance from the Bible by being the partaker ofthe &quotone bread&quot as is shown in 1st Corinthians 10:17. Thisbook encourages the church to share in the universal joy and natureof the church, and also, remain united beyond the diversity ofparticular community groups.10Furthermore, it releases people`s believe from the need toartificially create unity.

The missiologist statement above is agreeable in the sense thatmono-cultural churches fail to abide by modern evangelicalism byfailing to represent the Church as diverse parts. Revelation 7:9emphasizes on this through evaluating a redemptive idea belonging toa particular eschatological community to allow &quotmodern people&quotfrom worshiping together. The book of revelation disregards peoplefrom failing to worship together. When people agree to worship,celebrate, and learn from the diversity of ethnicity, gender, age,life changes, and class, which is brought about by multi-culturalchurches within the Christian community, the scandalous nature ofmono-cultural churches disappears.11The people also start to experience glimpses of eschatological hopefrom the foretaste position of the church.

People`s social and cultural biases are a hindrance to the churchand the kingdom of God as is shown in the Bible. Monoculturalchurches do not conform to Galatians 3:28, which talks about thenon-existence of &quotneither the Greek nor Jew, neither free norslave, nor female nor male, for all people, are one in ChristJesus.&quot12The scandalous nature of today`s mono-cultural churches fails towitness the authenticity brought forth by the power of the gospel tobring people together and reconcile them with God.

Monocultural churches are a scandal in that it blurs the glimpse ofthe kingdom of God. Revelation 7:10 in the New Testament provides aclear depiction of the kingdom of God. It says, &quotAfter this, Ilooked, and behold, a huge multitude of people that no one couldcount, from across the nations, from all languages and tribesstanding before the Lamb, with palm branches clothed with robes.&quot13The Scripture teaches the faithful that what is an important aspectof the &quotGod congregation&quot is characterized by race andethnicity. The Christ is calling upon people from across allcommunities and nations to himself. Therefore, mono-cultural churchesfail to excite God since they do not reflect God`s flock.

The Scripture disregard mono-cultural churches from the beginning.The Scripture talked about God when He said, &quotLet`s make man inmy image and likeness.&quot So in God`s eyes, He created man in &quotHisimage and likeness, in God`s image, He created male and female&quotGalatians 1:26-28. Both the male and female, in this regard, is madein God`s image. It is noted that historically, the Christians mindshave fought and wrestled with the fact about what this imagecomprises of.14Theologians comprehend the image to consist of spiritual, rational,governmental, moral, or ruling positions and functions. At thispoint, mono-cultural churches are thus disregarded not to abide bythe God`s own image regarding engaging in a broader sense of theterm.

Based on the New Testament teachings, diverse communitiesparticipating in the services of mono-cultural churches fall short ofits own teachings. For instance, as far as genealogy study isconcerned, the New Testament plainly agrees that God only recognizesone race. Instances of other bodily colors feature, for example, theskin color, may be disregarded and concluded that all people are madein God`s image.15The black, brown, red-haired, white, male or female – does notdetermine imagery distinctions, which may either interfere with the&quotgenetic or organic unity of human life&quot (Acts 17:26)

The fact that the New Testament knows nothing about people`scontemporary presumption about &quotrace&quot makes mono-culturalchurches appear scandalous in dealing with modern evangelicalism. Asa matter of fact, people may have skin color differences, but do notnecessarily belong to different ethnic backgrounds or faces. Thewhole idea of having one race in a church is fictitious and does notrepresent the ideals of Christ Jesus as is described in the NewTestament.16Additionally, to borrow from 1st Corinthians 8:4, these scandals arestated in a different way. It says that &quotour allegiance to raceis a form of idol worship.&quot It further states that &quotan idolis nothing of importance in the world.&quot These are mereconstructs that are inherited as a result of alienation created bythe fall. Psalms 115:8 states that &quotwe build them, and theyshape us&quot17

The restoration of people to see beyond their race and ethnicity isnot emphasized in mono-cultural churches, which also explains today`srarity of multi-cultural churches. This unity in Christ across allraces and ethnic backgrounds entails slow recovery of the God`s imagethat was lost in the Garden of Eden, as is seen in Corinthians 3:18.Since Christ Jesus acts as the &quotHindrance to God`s glory and theperfect imprint of His nature&quot (Hebrews 1:3-4), then the icon ofthe &quotinvisible God&quot (Colossians 1:15) unites people withChrist by restoring them to God`s image and likeness.18Here, the New Testament disregard all the structures that interferethe association of people with God and His image and likeness, be itrace or cultural differences.

Finally, missiologist`s statement resonates well with the NewTestament recognizing mono-cultural churches as a scandal to modernevangelicalism in that people`s social and cultural biases are a hugehindrance in the kingdom of God`s work. There exists nothing betterthan seeing people in the kind of environment where there aredifferent flavors of cultural backgrounds joined with one informedking of God`s values instead of going against what God sees as Hisvalues within the Kingdom.

For a fact, and regarding the above statement, the rarity of goodmodels of fully functional integrated churches is because of failurefor people to heed to the New Testament`s emphasis on the organicunity that Christians have in Christ Jesus. It also lies on thefailure of Christians to be willing enough to be decisive in theunderstanding of the essence of humanity inherited from fallenancestors as is emphasized by Galatians 4:3 when Paul called for the&quotworld`s elementary principles.&quot19

Fully-integrated models of the church are rare because people seemono-cultural churches as a place to be provided for connection tocustoms, home, ritual, language, and power structures. The emphasison mono-cultural churches in today`s world revolves around assistingthe minority groups from marginalization.20These churches are seen as a haven for the minority communities fromdangers of assimilation. Additionally, the rarity of fully integratedchurches is because they are in a position to confirm the notorietyof the church on the teachings about &quothomogenous unitprinciple.&quot

Conclusion

The UK missiologist forms the basis of this paper with his informedstatement about mono-cultural churches as a scandal and fullyintegrated churches being rare. Relevance is drawn from the NewTestament about how mono-cultural churches are viewed to interferewith the doctrines of evangelicalism. Some of this relevance is aboutpeople being created in the image and likeness of God. This image ofGod is understood by Theologians to include their rational, moral,spiritual, and other ruling functions, which ought to make up achurch and not necessarily one section of the Church`s race orcultural background.

Again, the paper touched on instances of these churches functioningas an unsafe haven for people from a different race. The scandalslikely to emerge are these communities being looked down upon for notbeing part of the &quotmajority race.&quot Additionally, the paperalso touched on the rarity of fully integrated churches, and what itmeans for the marginalized communities. For example, the rarity ofsuch churches means that these marginalized communities will fail tofunction properly in a given society, and thus goes against thedoctrines of the New Testament.

References

Anyabwile, T. (2010). Many Ethnicities, One Race. Washington, D.C.,15-18. Retrieved fromhttp://9marks.org/article/many-ethnicities-one-race/

Branson, M. L., &amp Martínez, J. F. (2011). Churches, cultures&amp leadership: A practical theology of congregations andethnicities, 13-29

DeYmaz, M. (2007). Building a Healthy Multi-ethnic Church:Mandate, Commitments and Practices. John Wiley &amp Sons, 26-36

DeYoung, C. P. (2003). United by faith: The multiracialcongregation as an answer to the problem of race. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press, 34-37

Foster, C. R. (1997). Embracing diversity: Leadership inmulticultural congregations. Bethesda, MD: Alban Institute, 45-47

Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization. (1978). The Pasadenaconsultation on the homogeneous unit principle. Wheaton, Ill:Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization, 25-45

McIntosh, G., &amp McMahan, A. (2012). Being the church in amulti-ethnic community: Why it matters and how it works.Indianapolis, Ind: Wesleyan Pub. House, 67-86

Milne, B. (2007). Dynamic diversity: Bridging class, age, race andgender in the church. Downers Grove, Ill: IVP Academic, 24-31

Padilla, C. R. (1985). Mission between the times: Essays. GrandRapids, Mich: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co, 36-41

Payne, J. D. (2012). Strangers next door: Immigration, migration,and mission. Downers Grove, Ill: IVP Books, 90-101

Rhoads, D. M. (1996). The challenge of diversity: The witness of Pauland the Gospels. Minneapolis, Minn: Fortress Press, 30-35

Rhodes, S. A. (1998). Where the nations meet: The church in amulticultural world, 19-27

Sudworth, R. (2007). Distinctly welcoming: Christian presence in amultifaith society. Bletchley: Scripture Union, 54-65

Tipsy, J. (2012). The Joyful Pursuit of Multi-ethnic Churches.Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theologyin Southern Africa.76-77 Retrieved fromhttp://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-joyful-pursuit-of-multi-ethnic-churches/

  1. 1DeYoung, C. P. (2003). United by faith: The multiracial congregation as an answer to the problem of race. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 34-37

  2. Sudworth, R. (2007). Distinctly welcoming: Christian presence in a multifaith society. Bletchley: Scripture Union, 54-65

2

  1. 3McIntosh, G., &amp McMahan, A. (2012). Being the church in a multi-ethnic community: Why it matters and how it works. Indianapolis, Ind: Wesleyan Pub. House, 67-86

  2. Payne, J. D. (2012). Strangers next door: Immigration, migration, and mission. Downers Grove, Ill: IVP Books, 90-101

4

  1. 5Milne, B. (2007). Dynamic diversity: Bridging class, age, race and gender in the church. Downers Grove, Ill: IVP Academic, 24-31

  1. 6Anyabwile, T. (2010). Many Ethnicities, One Race. Washington, D.C, 15-18. Retrieved from http://9marks.org/article/many-ethnicities-one-race/

  1. 7Tipsy, J. (2012). The Joyful Pursuit of Multi-ethnic Churches. Scriptura: International Journal of Bible, Religion and Theology in Southern Africa, 76-77. Retrieved from http://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/the-joyful-pursuit-of-multi-ethnic-churches/

  1. 8Rhodes, S. A. (1998). Where the nations meet: The church in a multicultural world, 19-27

  1. 9Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization. (1978). The Pasadena consultation on the homogeneous unit principle. Wheaton, Ill: Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization, 25-45

  1. 10DeYmaz, M. (2007). Building a Healthy Multi-ethnic Church: Mandate, Commitments and Practices. John Wiley &amp Sons, 26–36

  1. 11Foster, C. R. (1997). Embracing diversity: Leadership in multicultural congregations. Bethesda, MD: Alban Institute, 47-49

  1. 12Rhodes, Where the nations meet: The church in a multicultural world, 23

  1. 13Rhoads, D. M. (1996). The challenge of diversity: The witness of Paul and the Gospels. Minneapolis, Minn: Fortress Press, 30-35

  1. 14McIntosh &amp McMahan, Being the church in a multi-ethnic community: Why it matters and how it works, 70

  1. 15Sudworth, Distinctly welcoming: Christian presence in a multi-faith society, 60

  1. 16Padilla, C. R. (1985). Mission between the times: Essays. Grand Rapids, Mich: W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co., 36-41

  1. 17Payne, J. D. (2012). Strangers next door: Immigration, migration, and mission, 95

  1. 18Milne, Dynamic diversity, 27

  1. 19DeYoung, United by faith, 37

  1. 20Branson, M. L., &amp Martínez, J. F. (2011). Churches, cultures &amp leadership: A practical theology of congregations and ethnicities, 13-29