Mobile Learning Intervention for Third Grade Students

Free essays 0 Comments

MOBILE LEARNING INTERVENTION FOR THIRD GRADE STUDENTS 5

MobileLearning Intervention for Third Grade Students

Citation

Kiger,D., Herro, D., &amp Prunty, D. (2012). Examining the influence of amobile learning intervention on third grade math achievement. Journalof Research on Technology in Education,45(1), 61-82.

Abstract

Thearticle highlights an experimental research conducted to examine thesignificance of mobile learning intervention (MLI). The study tookplace at a Midwestern elementary school, with the program taking nineweeks (Kiger, Herro, &amp Prunty, 2012). Two classes used flashcardsto learn mathematics while another group of two used web applicationsfor iPod. The findings from the study indicate that the MLI studentsrecorded significant improvements in the attainment of learninginstructions. The study shows a considerable influence of MLI ondifficult multiplication items although the students’ demographicprofile and teacher’s knowledge in technology are also consideredmore important. The authors propose a further experimental researchto identify the implications of the long-term of MLI for diversestudents. Moreover, the research recommends a study on varioussettings and teaching models for e-learning.

ResearchQuestions

  1. Does participation in the MLI explain a significant amount of variation on a post-intervention multiplication test controlling for several covariates including prior student achievement? If so, what is the influence of the intervention relative to the control variables?

  2. Does participation in the MLI explain a significant amount of variation on the most difficult post-intervention multiplication items controlling for several covariates, including prior student achievement? If so, what is the influence of the intervention relative to the control variables?

of the Research Design

Thestudy is a quasiexperimental considering that both the teachingapproach and the independent variable is exploitable to adjust theresults.Similarly, the pre-test and post-test achievement scoresand a survey on student satisfaction functions as the dependentvariables. Another dependent variable is the satisfaction of thestudents, which was conducted using the survey approach. On the samenote, the study utilizes a convenience since the data is collectedfrom the students participating in the test.

Critiqueof the Research

Thearticle critique aims at analyzing the completeness, usability,consistency, and applicability of the journal article. With thearticle being a primary source journal article, this article willcommence with the introduction and review of the mobile learningapproaches. The suitability of the method applied, and theeffectiveness that is attributable to the discussion used in thestudy will be critiqued in this paper. Different aspects of thejournal will be addressed to realize its contribution anddeficiencies entirely.

Theabstract is clear and comprehensive. It gives a clear literature onthe information the broad aim of the research study. The abstractgoes further to point out the study was intended on certain models ofmobile learning for third graders. Moreover, a general observation isoutlined including the emerging trends in mobile learning, withparticular emphasis on the apps for mathematics in daily practice.The study looks into issues iPod touch devices, MLI for third grade,and school-wide math curriculum.

Theappreciation of the past literature on mobile learning is beingrecognized in enhancing the realization of positive learningoutcomes. The study focussed on the way the mobile learning canimprove the achievement of math instructions for third-gradestudents. From the introduction, it is easier for the reader to havea clear understanding and focus on the subject matter of the study.The introductory part of the journal article captures the mind of thereader with an overview on aspects of mobile learning. The usage ofclear subtopics improves the flow and understanding of the journal.Both the abstract and the introduction of the journal article arecrucial, as they have introduced to the reader what is expected inthe body part of the journal content and the critique. Nonetheless, Iconsider that the introductory part was long with many subtopics thatcould have been captured by putting them under literature review. Theintroduction is also not clearly highlighted where the authors leavethe reader to make personal imagination, as it is at the beginning ofthe article. Highlighting the subtopics with keywords enables thereaders to familiarize themselves with the language expected to bemet in the article.

Afterthe introduction, there is a high-quality review of the currentpractice in mobile learning and the attainment of math instructions.Nonetheless, there should have been an indication from the authorwhether what was being read was the literature review considering itthis was not indicated. The content of the literature contained is ofaverage quality with exact points and simple language for easierunderstanding. Moreover, the author captures the research questionsregarding the matter under study.

Incarrying out the study, it is crucial for a researcher to perform apractical study that links theoretical and practical information.Nonetheless, the authors ought to have given a hypothetical casehighlighting the significant issues arising from various students andinstitutions. The authors should have considered differentperspectives on the subject matter and how it would enable them tomake a comprehensive examination. Such an approach is a significantattempt made by the researchers to understand the area of researchthey are studying precisely.

Otherissues discussed by the authors include the implication of the studytowards enhancing education and integration of technology. Thelimitations of the study highlighted include similarities instudents’ demographics and enrollment history. It also did notconsider how learning takes place within a mobile setting. Thestudy’s responses are not clearly summarized in the article’sconclusion, which is not indicated. The conclusion should haveexplained the contribution of the research and would have opened roomfor further studies. Overall, the journal article is comprehensive inthe way it handled the research on mobile learning for third-gradestudents. The organization of the publication was average whichclearly shows the flow of information. The strength of the article,however, can be attributed to its comprehensive content.