Transgender Porn – Effects, Implication and Social Discourses Outline

Free essays 0 Comments

TransgenderPorn – Effects, Implication and Social Discourses

Outline

  1. Abstract

  2. Effects of Transgender Porn

  • Fantasy

  • Addiction and over-reliance

  • Altered sexual practices

  • Flawed social standing

  • Provocation to trans-sexual individuals

  • Sexual abuse

  1. Beliefs, taboos and misconceptions of transgender porn

  2. Social discussions surrounding transgender porn

  3. Future recommendations

  4. Conclusion

  5. References

Abstract

Thispaper examines the effects and implications of transgender pornandhow the porn industry has opened dialogical discourses and alteredthe state of sexuality. Discussions surrounding transgenderscreenings are difficult for most and often considered taboo. Somediscussions have been harder to begin than others. Indeed, thefluidity of sexuality has been affected by broken communications,discussions and controversies. There is need to critically look attransgender porn, social implications and effects, beliefs andtaboos, and the social discussions surrounding this category ofpornography.

Despitethe many years that porn has existed, the media continues to elicitdifferent views from viewers and the public at large. The screeningof sexual encounters of young people, adults, and older individualsconflicts societal views and triggers arguments. It sparksa uniquecontroversy with regard to the moral standing of porn. The generalperspective of the screening of sex is that it is deviant, sick,perverted, and destructive (Blackford, 1998). A lot of communicationand controversy existing at a social level is that the content ofporn does not conform to acceptable norms, values and ethics. Itcontravenes the well-known and acceptable behavior. Perhaps thegreatest genre of above media is the screening of transgenderintercourses which elicits a lot of negative and conflicting views(Attwood, 2010). Trans-gender are individuals with sexual organs andcharacteristics as those of the opposite sex. These are mostly ladieswho exemplify ‘male reproductive organs’ and therefore screenintercourse with people of the same sex – which in this case aregirls, ladies and other women. But how does transgender porn affectcommunications and opens a new area of controversy? What issues andconcerns areencompassed in above media that provokes the views,feelings and attitudes of people?

Effectsof Transgender Porn

Fantasy

Similarto any other media, porn has the ability to create recurring mentaleffects and hence the viewer develops a tendency to recall thescenes. The content of transgender porn specifically creates a mentalstimulation and fantasy because it is unique and satisfies both maleand female expectations of porn (Dryer, 1999). More clearly, the factthat there are a few transgender individuals makes the porn scenesunique and enticing. Research notes that kids and young adults arelikely to be affected by fantasy than any other group of porn viewers(Fitch and Cox, 2007). This is because they are psychologicallyvulnerable and lack the energy and the moral courage to shunfantasies and imaginations. The fact that porn harbors uniquefantasies, emotions, feelings and attitudes means that it is subjectto controversy and affects the views of people regarding sex. What ismore is that transgenderstraverse to opposite gender due to lack ofidentity and selfhood. This leaves a lot of be desired in terms ofwhat is acceptable and what people should see (Kingi et al. 2004).This analysis therefore supports that transgender porn has sparkednew communications with regard to porn. Indeed, it continues toaffect the fluidity of sexuality and how we view screenedintercourses. A primary drive to this effect, as seen in this sectionof the research, is the ability of porn to trigger fantasies,imaginations, and mental visuals (Laumann et al. 2000).

Additionand Over-reliance

Populartheorists argue it is in the nature of human to do what it pleasesthe mind, the body and soul. People are inclined to perform and actin a way that fulfills bodily and emotional cravings (Escoffier,2009). Individuals develops a tendency to continually watchtransgender screenings online, in the television and in other formsof media. Indeed, the fact that transgender actors perform withmembers of the opposite sex makes the scene unavoidable, unique, andout-of-the ordinary. Existing views and perspectives regarding thefluidity of sexuality supports and champion sex between two peoplemale and female. Any other scene contravenes acceptable norms andvalues. This genre of porn [trans-sexual] affects the fluidity ofsexuality because it develops over-reliance on porn and graduallyleads to addition. It is mature supposition to note that if viewerswere not interested in this media, they would not develop suchreliance. The media would soon lose the market and would be out ofbusiness. Enterprises running above platforms are aware thattransgender porn has a unique market, they are therefore likely toscreen more of similar mediato sustain online followers and viewers(McNair, 2002). Therefore, another way that this specific type ofmedia affects the fluidity of sexuality and opens communication isits nature of addiction and over-reliance. It has managed to createreturning viewers and continues to get more likes, clicks and viewsacross the globe.

AlteredSexual Practices

Flawedsexual practices are another effect and implication of transgenderporn. Transgender individuals will be more inclined to have anintercourse with members of the opposite sex when exposed to themedia. Research reveals that a good number of transsexuals haveintercourse with opposite mates due to exposure to television, onlineand shows (Allen, 2006). As seen in previous sections of this paper,the fluidity of sexuality occurs when a male and a female have anencounter. However, any other thing conflicts with what we expect andwhat we believe is upright and moral. This research supports that thescreening, the publishing, and the portrayal of transgender porn hasencouraged individuals to perform similar acts in real life. This hasled to altered sexual practices because individuals traverse to‘prohibited’ actions and freely perform what conflicts theexpectations of the majority. It is also a mature speculation to notewith the increasing number of transgenders having encounters withmembers of the opposite sex, there will be a flawed perspective ofsex (Mead, 1935). More clearly, above intercourses are destructiveand deviant. They contravene socially acceptable views.

FlawedSocial Standing

Withaltered sexual practices comes a flawed society. A society, acommunity and a given population is defined by what it embraces andthe activities it advocateson a regular basis. When a given communityembraces transgender porn, it will be declared as immoral and abovedeclaration will affect its interactions with the rest of the world.This research therefore supports that the increasing occurrence ofthis genre of porn on the internet triggers a highly controversialtopic. Most important is that societies that seem to agree or concurwith above media will be disregarded and considered as having adestructive and immoral standing (Sprinkle, 1998). Transgender porntherefore affects the fluidity of sexuality as it is likely toencourage one community or a specific society to embrace it. Whatresults is a flawed social standing and disagreements betweennations, countries, and States. There is a clear example that can beused to illustrate above notion. When selected States in the U.Sembraced homosexuality, they were seen as non-conforming by theremaining States. Their ability to legalize similar marriagesalienated themselves from all the other ‘conforming’ States. Moreclearly, they had a flawed social standing therefore creatingdisharmony with the remaining States (Royalle, 1993). Similar totransgender porn, societies and communities that champion such mediaare likely to be disregarded and possibly ignored by other nations.

Provocationto Trans-sexual Individuals

Transgenderporn screens individuals having encounters with either males orfemales. There is no clear category of people that transgenderindividuals interact with (Hill and Thompson, 2000). There is a starkdisharmony in the media. This research supports that transgender porncontinues to provoke members of this specific category. More clearly,they are not respected, are humiliated, and continue to face otherinstigations. Respecting transgenders will require giving them avoice regarding their actions and adoring their physical state. Therise of transgender porn shows a major disconnect between what peopleexpect and what porn business is currently doing. Such media islikely to show transgenders having encounters with no specificcategory of people. Studies continue to support that sometimes,trans-sexuals are cajoled, coaxed and wheedled to act in ways thatwill entice the wider public (Williams, 2004). This is so regardlessof whether or not their actions fulfill innate desires, emotions,attitudes and feelings.Perhaps this is the reason above genre of pornstands as a subject of criticism and continues to affect the fluidityof sexuality.

SexualAbuse

Sexualabuse is both a current and a historic topic sincemolestationscontravene fundamental human rights and freedoms.Children, young adults, and old people are all subject to sexualabuse meaning that such form of molestation is not biased to aspecific group, individual or age. However, research supports thattransgenders are likely to be abused given their ‘unique’physical and sexual state (Carter, 1981). Such molestation may comein many forms including rape, assault, and humiliation throughtalks, discussions, and arguments. More clearly, trans-sexuals are atthe center of ridicule, derision and mockery. This is partly becausethey have not identified themselves and are likely to fit in eithermale or female. Lack of sexual identity subjects them to sexual abuseand other forms of molestations (Tisdale, 1995). Perhaps this is thereason transgender porn attracts controversy, continues to affect thefluidity of sexuality, and opens a new dialogical discourse withregard to porn discussions and communication. Most importantly isthat trans-sexuals are likely to be abused that any other gender(Adams, 1998). This is because they fit in any of the two categoriesmale and female. This means there is the existence of a uniquevulnerability to their sexuality and their overall physical state.

Taboosand Misconceptions

Apopular proscription is that transgenders are male. Viewers have astrong belief that trans-sexuals are male because they possessmasculine features. What is more, they are portrayed as male whenthey have sexual encounters with females. Scholars support that beingmale is not solely subject to the sexual features and characteristics(Buck Angel Interview, 2011). As such, holding that trans-sexuals aremale is a popular misconstruction that affects and continues toaffect a large number of people. Another misconception is thattrans-sexuals are female. The fact that they possess a number offeminine features does not render them female. Indeed, a good numberof them consider themselves male and have the right to undergosurgery and identify themselves with a specific category of peopleeither male or female (Smith, 1999). This research supports there isthe existence of many other misconstructions with regard totrans-sexuals, most of which might not be true. Trans-genderindividuals are people with a set of both male and femalecharacteristics and therefore have a unique identity transsexual(Yep, 2003). Any other view is subject to academic scrutinyandresearch by scientists, theorists, religious leaders, and othersocial players.

SocialDiscussions Surrounding Transgender Porn

Thefluidity of sexuality is what is acceptable and what people hold asthe true definition of sex (Hardy, 2008). Most pornography screeningsare consistent with the views of the majority and therefore lesslikely to receive ridicule and public contempt. The fluidity ofsexuality is what defines the society and what one is expected towatch, advocate for and champion. Although porn is considereddestructive, sick and deviant (Smith, 1999), it is not a shock whenparents and guardians realize their young ones are involved in suchmedia. It is a stage of growth and development. Transgender porn hashowever attracted conflicting views and discussion as it creates anew discourse. The conversation triggered about trans-sexuals is aheated one and one that involves major disagreements and conflicts.Proponents believe that this ‘gender’ is male and is thereforesupposed to interact with females. The opponents on the other handbelieve trans-sexuals are females and therefore should focus on males(Escoffier, 2009). Above views and perspectives affect the fluidityof sexuality and continue to open other discourses with regard totrans-gender pornography. What is more is that trans-gender pornviewers are likely to watch lesbian shows and sometimes screeningsinvolving gay (Escoffier, 2009). They are not specific to a givenmedia and above traversing may affect their sexual identity.

Theeffect of transgender porn is diverse and is experienced acrosspopulations and generations. It opens a discourse with regard to whatis right and what is wrong. Social theorists and scholars have notsuccessfully established a conclusion on the topic and perhaps thisis the reason above genre is subject to public ridicule (Smith,1999). While the society gives trans-sexuals the ability to undergosurgery and gain identity, it does not offersexual liberation asportrayed by the media internet, television shows, and films. Abovegender continue to be a subject of discussion and much conversationaffects their identity, degrades self-worth, self-image, anddownplays self-respect. It lowers their dignity (Taormino, 2013). Thecommercial success of trans-gender porn is underscored primarily bythe large number of viewers. This is an indication that the public isinterested in above category of porn as it fulfills both male andfemale viewers. The society and porn audiences have shown reliance onthis category of porn however, there is little say from trans-sexualthemselves. They are central to the topic but their views andperspectives are not necessarily considered (Black Angel Interview,2011).

FutureRecommendations

In2001, porn generated a revenue of $2 billion and $4 billion in theUnited States. It is a thriving industry that attracts financialsuccess in multiple platforms and boasts of numerous players (Hardy,2008). Porn harbors many other benefits among them mentalsimulation, exploration and a source of knowledge. This means thatthe topic cannot be disregarded as it is central to the livelihood ofpeople communities, households, regions, and the society at large(Chavalier,2007). Sources continues to relate porn media with many otherbenefits including provision of expectation with regard to real-lifeencounters, allowing men [and women] to sustain their sexual life, itis a form of expression and liberation (Allen, 2006). Pornographyalso creates a unique discovery particularly to behaviors andconducts that people consider private and hidden but which areinteresting, healthy and fulfilling.

Regardless,porn is destructive based on content. This is so particularly whenits players portray trans-sexuals with a no distinct category ofactors and mates (Currah, 2006). More clearly, trans-genderindividuals in porn media are not identified with a specific categoryof people. It is mature pre-supposition to note that a clear andbalanced position of porn could be achieved if trans-sexuals wererespected, honored and adored. Although above is quite challenging,it is possible (Tisdalle, 1995). There is need for further researchwith regard to this genre of pornography. Most importantly is theneed for scholars, educators, and other insightful players to comeforward with a clear and more substantial view. The media cannot bedisregarded it can only be embraced through meaningful discussionsand debates. Talks that feature a moral standing and deep respect toexisting genders and cross-genders.

Conclusion

Theresearch has examined trans-gender porn and how it elicitsconflicting perspectives from viewers. Of special concern for thepaper was to discuss the effects and implications of transgender pornand how such impacts open a new discourse in the society. The papergoes ahead to examine the misconstructions surrounding trans-sexualsand how such taboos drive conversations, discussions, and discoursesin given audiences. The final section of the paper discusses what canbe done to shape existing media including the need for educators andresearchers to give direction to this specific discussion. Wherepossible, the research subscribes to the views of social theoristsand scientific scholars from sources such as scholarly journals,publications and academic literature. The above analysis surmises thepaper adding knowledge and creating insight on how to give directionto existing discourses and shape trans-sexual genre of porn.

References

Adams,P. (1988). Per os(cillation). CameraObscura: A Journal of Feminist and Film Theory,6,2, 7-29.

Allen,L. (2006). “Looking at the real thing”: young men, pornography,and sexuality education. Discourse:Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education,27,1, 710-724.

Attwood,F. (2010). Porn.com:Making sense of online pornography.New York: Peter Lang.

Blachford,G. (1978). Looking at pornography: Erotica and the socialistmorality. GayLeft,6(Summer),16-20.

BuckAngel Interview, 21 March 2011. Interview done through emailexchanges.

Butler,J. (1990). GenderTrouble. NewYork: Routledge.— (2004). UndoingGender. NewYork: Routledge

Carter,M. (1981). The re-education of desire: Some thoughts on currenterotic visual practices. Artand Text,4(Summer),20-38.

Chavalier,M. (2007). Confessionsof a Transsexual Porn Star.Bloomington: AuthorHouse.

Currah,P. (2006). Transgenderrights.Minneapolis [u.a.: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Dryer,R. (1999). Coming to terms: Gay pornography in L. P. Gross &amp J.D. Voods (Eds.) TheColumbia Reader on Lesbians and Gay Men in Media, Society, andPolitics (479-485).NewYork: Columbia University Press.

Escoffier,J. (2009). BiggerThan Life: The History of Gay Porn Cinema From Beefcake to Hardcore. Philadelphia: Running Press Book Publishers.

Fitch,E. &amp Cox, M. R. (2007). QuestionsKids Ask About Sex: Honest Answers for Every Age. GrandRapids, MI: Fleming H Revell.

Hardy,S. (2008). The pornography of reality. Sexualities,11,1-2, 60-64.

Hill,A. &amp Thompson, K. (2000). Sex and the media: a shiftinglandscape. In R. Jowel, et al (Eds), BritishSocial Attitudes. The 17thReport: Focusing on Diversity. London.

Kingi,V. M., Poppelwell, E. &amp Paulin J. (2004). The viewing habits ofusers of sexually explicit movies. Report for the Office of Film andLiterature Classification.

Laumann,E., Gagnon, J., Michael, R., &amp Michaels, S. (2000). Survey ofsexual behavior of Americans. In P. Adler &amp P. Adler (Eds.),Constructionsof Deviance: Social Power, Context, and Interaction.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

McNair,B. (2002). StripteaseCulture: Sex, Media and Democratization of Desire. NewYork: Routledge.— (2007). Teaching Porn. Sexualities,12,5, 558-567.

Mead,M. (1935). Sexand Temperament. NewYork: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.

Royalle,C. (1993). Porn in the USA. SocialText,37,Winter, 23-32.

Smith,K. B. (1999). Clean thoughts and dirty minds: The politics of porn.PolicyStudies Journal,27,4, 723-734.

Sprinkle,A. (1998). Post-pornModernist: My 25 Years as a Multimedia Whore. SanFrancisco: Cleis Press.

Taormino,T. (2013). Thefeminist porn book: The politics of producing pleasure.New York, NY: Feminist Press at the City University of New York.

Tisdale,S. (1995). TalkDirty to Me: An Intimate Philosophy of Sex. London:Pan Books.

Williams,L. (2004). PornStudies. Durham,NC: Duke University Press. — (1991).Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the ‘Frenzy of the Visible’,London: Pandora.

Yep,G. A. (2003). The Violence of heteronormativity in communicationstudies: Notes oninjury, healing, and queer world-making. Journalof Homosexuality,45,2, 11-59.